Table of Contents
I would certainly add Toyota 2/3TC electric motor is somewhere in the leading three yet with those domestics you absolutely have my leading 4 of perpetuity for dependability. Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never ever had an engine problem. Corrosion is a various tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it just seemed like a diesel.
I wonder exactly how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time obtaining out of it's own means ... the 300i6 would certainly do everything I need this truck to do patgizz created: 3 things in the automotive world refuse to break.
those must be held as the criteria to which every little thing else is gauged. sadly, practically everything else fades in contrast. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based on the chevy stovebolt 6 certainly) Wow, because of the outpour of praise, it looked excellent so I got it, below's the advertisement lmk what you men assume Oops, didn't indicate to be puzzling, it slipped my mind that the "5.0" was technically a 4.9 l.
initially order of biz though, I'm rather huge, and the guiding wheel to seat is relatively slim ... man that wheel cover was not ribbed for my pleasure:-LRB- The only problem I've ever seen with vehicles like that, are busted shifters. Ford made them a little as well difficult and they would certainly break right at the floorboard.
Remember the gas mileage will not be the ideal on the planet, however it will damn sure run permanently. Edit: I'm 6'2" and 280. I always had lots of room in the taxi of them. wbjones wrote: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 vehicle. Never ever had an engine issue.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it simply seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 mixed, 20 freeway with the OD5. I question exactly how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time leaving it's very own method ... The engine bay had not been developed for anything longer than a Mod electric motor. One CAN remove an engine from a '97 style F-150 from the top, yet it sucks. Mod electric motors require to come out sidewards and you need to pull the damper and water pump off of a 4.2. The core support does not unbolt like in F250s and later F150s.
WonkoTheSane composed: spitfirebill wrote: In reply to HappyAndy: Thanks Captain Obvious What did he claim to necessitate this? I'm really interested. I didn't see anything in his reply that would require this feedback. "They are usually dependable as gravity as long as they aren't sludged up" What engine likes sludge? Knurled composed: wbjones composed: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 truck.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it just sounded like a diesel. I ask yourself how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Very very cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek blog post, that I didn't explain ... my poor In reply to spitfirebill: I added that point due to the fact that when I needed to locate a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go with every one in every junkyard in South Jacket to locate one that wasn't sludged up really badly.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to chat regarding a couple of issues of these vans, yet I I'm plainly not going to come out and say one is far better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the exact same lorry.
Mark: So, well, allow's start with engines after that. Allow's talk regarding engine and actually just to specify that the design years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you understand, I suggest, these vans have actually been around for a long time.
And, you understand, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around because, you recognize, around that time too. We're not going to obtain back right into, into the earlier stuff. Given that 2000, I mean, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are much more popular and I wouldn't actually recommend a V6 engine.
There's a lot of concerns with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with impact to these engines, since they didn't have sufficient threading in the spark plug, which caused problems.
Very very cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek post, that I didn't make clear ... my poor In respond to spitfirebill: I included that point because when I had to locate a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go via every one in every junkyard in South Jersey to find one that had not been sludged up truly severely.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to speak concerning a few problems of these vans, but I I'm plainly not going to come out and claim one is better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the same car.
They appear to be a little bit more used because area, but, you recognize, those are a few of the uses, however they're basically the same category of lorry. Mark: So, well, allow's begin with engines after that. What problems do you see in between these 2 cars? Bernie: Yeah. So allow's speak concerning engine and in fact just to specify that the design years, we're mosting likely to begin with 2000 and up, you understand, I mean, these vans have actually been around for a long period of time.
And, you understand, for a variation of a Chevy van has actually been around considering that, you recognize, around that time also. So we're not going to obtain back right into, into the earlier stuff. Because 2000, I imply, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are far more popular and I wouldn't really recommend a V6 engine.
There's a whole lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with impact to these engines, due to the fact that they really did not have adequate threading in the stimulate plug, which triggered issues.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealer around Irvine, California
Ford F150 dealer around Irvine
Ford F150 dealer